Received first "review" of God's True Patriot weblog, if you can call it that. Will link to it here, but I warn you there is profanity on that website. It is not suitable for children. The smut-peddler slash critic had this to say on my personal messageboard:

I have not reviewed your site, because based on your request I get the impression that you did not understand what I meant when I said that I did not review content. I review site design exclusively. Therefore, your request that I review your writing will not be honored. There is an explanation on the site if you are interested. Check the archive link and look for "God's True Patriot" to see it if it isn't on the main page.


F***in' Ugly

No design??? This poor sap can't see the clouds! Now, I do admit my "design" skills are limited. I'm just not very good at woman's work. My girl Cecilia recently created her own online diary and even she is better at making things prettier than I am. Cecilia is a talented girl, and I think there's a good chance she may become an even more famous author than I am.


It's just a real shame, a travesty, that the foul hordes of Satan lack good taste in addition to lacking basic moral values. It's all laid out clearly in Deuteronomy 22:5:

The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are an abomination unto the Lord thy God!

To understand the scriptures properly, one must have a high degree of historical knowledge, which I have. One must know that in ancient times both men and women wore long flowing robes. The key difference between the two was that women's robes were prettier. Therefore, pretty things pertaineth unto women, which is why my website is not pretty.


I explained this to my good friend Sidney Sheldon and things became heated. He said that men should not wear kimonos, and women should not wear pants. He's a good Christian patriot, but sometimes I think my friend has a screw loose. The Lord has no problem with women wearing pants, so long as they don't wear them in the household. The key to understanding this scripture is that it refers to ornamental display which is intended to indicate gender role.


In this way, Queer Eye for the Straight Guy is extremely sinful and men's hotpants are more sinful than kimonos. I was wearing a kimono at the time, and so I can understand the man's confusion, but this smut-peddler critic has no such excuse. He had no way of knowing that I even own a kimono!